November 27, 2006

Deadly Warrant II

The case of Kathryn Johnston, the elderly Atlanta woman killed in a no-knock raid, grows stranger:

An informant who narcotics officers say led them to the house where an elderly woman was killed in a drug raid is accusing the officers of asking him to lie about his role, Atlanta police Chief Richard Pennington said Monday.

The informant, who has not been identified, complained to department officials that the drug investigators involved in the bust had asked him to go along with a story they concocted after the shooting, said Pennington. He said the informant had been placed in protective custody.

The informant told an Atlanta television station that the officers asked him to lie to provide them cover in the shooting.

Pennington confirmed the television station's account of what the informant had claimed and said it mirrored what the informant had told his Internal Affairs Unit over the weekend.

"The informant said he had no knowledge of going into that house and purchasing drugs," Pennington said. "We don't know if he's telling the truth."

All seven narcotics investigators involved in the raid have been suspended with pay pending the outcome of the investigation, Pennington said. Their names were not made public.
...
In a court affidavit released Monday, Jason R. Smith, an Atlanta narcotics officer, said that the informant had used $50 of city money to buy crack cocaine from Sam at the house at 933 Neal Street. Smith, who could not be reached for comment Monday night, described the informant as a reliable source of information who has helped police make drug arrests in the past.

In the affidavit, Smith said Sam greeted the informant at the front door and spoke briefly to him on the porch. Sam disappeared into the house and reappeared with two bags of crack cocaine, which the informant later turned over to the officers, according to the affidavit. Smith's statement also said that the informant had alleged that Sam had installed surveillance cameras at the house and monitored them constantly.

Smith's affidavit was sufficient to persuade Fulton County Magistrate Kimberly Warden to sign a warrant allowing the officers to enter the house without knocking on the door. Smith asked for the special "no knock" authorization because of the possibility that officers would be injured or evidence would be destroyed. Warden signed the warrant shortly before 6 p.m., about an hour before the shooting.

However, the informant has since denied to police and a local television station that he purchased the drugs. He also said there was no person named Sam.

The informant, who said he worked with Atlanta police for four years, also told WAGA-TV that he hadn't been to 933 Neal Street. His identity hidden, he told the TV station that one of the drug officers called him soon after the shooting with instructions.

Quoting the police officers, the informant told Fox 5 News: " 'This is what you need to do. You need to cover our (rear). ... It's all on you man. ... You need to tell them about this Sam dude.' "

Pennington said investigators were trying to determine the truth. "I don't know if he went in or not," he said.

If the informant is telling the truth, things look very bad for the Atlanta PD. Of course, if he's lying things don't look so great either, as they found no narcotics in Mrs. Johnston's house.

I'm as fond of casual no-knocks and subsequent escalation to deadly force as I am of using Eminent Domain to give a developer someone's property.

Lots more over at the Agitator.

(AJC login/pswd=nojuan@spammenot.net/nojuan.)

***
Previous postings:
The Kathryn Johnston Thanksgiving Open-House Thread
Death Warrant

Posted by floridacracker at November 27, 2006 11:16 PM

   



Comments

CI's, once they contact the press, should no longer be CI's.

I'm sorry, I don't like giving CI's more confidentiality than undercover cops.

If our undercover cops were as confidential as CI's, then we wouldn't need so many CI's. But the press treats cops as domestic spies, and CI's as brave whistleblowers.

If we had more UCO's and fewer CI's there would be less mixup, and more cause for legation.

The press is disgusting. They have outed PLEANTY of UCO's, but they protect, known CI's. They side with criminals.

Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 28, 2006 01:06 AM

A couple of years ago, cops here in Jacksonville Beach went into a crowded restaurant at dinner time to arrest the bartender for selling alcohol to minors. This was a typical chain restaurant in a strip mall on the main street of town - not some dive.

Trouble is, the drug squad made the raid, which meant the cops were not wearing traditional uniforms - they were wearing all black outfits and full,head covering hoods. The 911 lines exploded with calls from patrons who thought they were being attacked by terrorists.

I've often wondered what would have happened if one of the patrons had had a legal gun and had decided to protect himself as allowed by Florida law. I suspect a bloodbath would have followed with dozens of wholly innocent people wounded or killed.

Why didn't they send in two uniformed police officers if they wanted to show off while making an arrest? This militarization of our police forces is going entirely too far.

Posted by: Juan Paxety at November 28, 2006 09:09 AM

Juan, you hit it right on the head...

"This militarization of our police forces is going entirely too far."

THAT is the problem... when those swore to "Protect and serve" instead have become control freaks on a mission where there are no innocents and only perps then its time for a change.

Posted by: Gmac at November 28, 2006 02:57 PM

People've been complaining about the militarization of the police for quite a while now, and also the issue of deadly force. Robo-cops aren't needed to arrest a guy for selling booze to minors. It's just overkill and sets up a dangerous situation for the potential escalation of violence.

Posted by: Donnah at November 28, 2006 06:26 PM